Is That Surgery You’re Thinking About Even Necessary?  
What You Need to Know About Surgery

Is That Surgery You’re Thinking About Even Necessary?  

Alternative treatments never makes it into clinical practices, and doctors continue with protocols that should be used as a last resort.
November 02, 2023
Updated:
January 11, 2024
0:00
This is part 8 in What You Need to Know About Surgery

In series, we’ll share how to determine if your surgery is right for you, how to ask the right questions, and what you can do to prepare and recover optimally.

Four different surgeons told Jared Lichtin he needed back surgery. But he'd met other patients at his physical therapy appointments who regretted getting back surgery and felt they were even worse off.

Mr. Lichtin thought it might better to avoid any sort of operation. He resisted surgeons’ pushing the procedure, believing they were doing what they’d been taught to do: “sell” him on surgery.

“If you walk into a Burger King, they’re going to sell you a burger. You walk into a hospital, and they’re going to sell you something. They’re financially incentivized,” he said. “It’s a system that’s been corrupted through insurance, through government, through greed.

“You have to make your own decisions. If you don’t, someone else is going to make them for you.”

Elective surgeries like Mr. Lichtin’s may not be necessary in many cases—a line that’s been frequently blurred. Physician training and even research can be confusing. Often, the science supporting alternative treatments never makes it into clinical practices, and doctors continue with protocols that should be used as a last resort after other therapies have been tried.

You can live without organs such as your gallbladder and appendix, which doctors often suggest be removed. Likewise, some studies show that having vertebrae fused together lowers pain, that stents can lower the risk of cardiac disease, and that stomach-shrinking surgeries can treat obesity. In some cases, such promises come true. But not always.

Somewhere along the way, operations reserved for specific scenarios drifted into standard practice despite the reality that they often aren’t the best option. Patients are rarely offered evidence that contradicts advice to undergo surgery. What surgeons may not tell you—and may not know—is that many elective surgeries don’t produce universally positive results, or that other approaches can be just as effective—often without adverse effects.

“Surgery has become a way of life for us, particularly in America ... drugs and surgery, it’s what we reach for first,” Dr. Kyrin Dunston, founder of the Midlife Metabolism Institute and The Hormone Club, told The Epoch Times.

Specific Procedures Are Often Unnecessary

While financial incentives may play a significant part, doctors say they overprescribe procedures for a variety of reasons.
A survey of more than 2,000 physicians revealed that they believe more than 10 percent of procedures performed are unnecessary. The results were published in 2017 in PLOS One. When asked why they would proceed with unnecessary surgeries, 85 percent cited a fear of being sued for malpractice.

The other top reason given in the survey was that they believed patients wanted the procedure anyway. However, the study pointed to research showing doctors can be mistaken about what kind and extent of care patients really desire, and when physicians advocate for more, then patients get the impression the procedure is actually necessary.

Interestingly, the doctors polled believe their peers are more likely to perform unnecessary procedures when they profit from them, which leads to low-value care that patients ought to be aware of, Dr. Aaron E. Carroll argued in a JAMA Forum article.
Low-value care is defined as health care in which the cost or harms outweigh the benefits.
“The elephant in the room—sometimes—is, of course, money. Some physicians have a direct financial conflict of interest in making decisions as to what patients should receive. Physicians who own surgical, laboratory, or radiological centers receive extra compensation from the services they advocate for their patients,” Dr. Carroll wrote. “More pervasively, the entire health care system is subtly and indirectly influenced by reimbursement.”

Not Even the Pandemic Slowed Down Overtreatment

The Lown Institute, a nonpartisan think tank that has been tracking unnecessary tests and procedures, issued a report in May 2021 that a low-value test or procedure is performed every 80 seconds in the United States. It published a ranking of more than 3,100 hospitals to highlight those that avoid tests and procedures that offer little to no benefit.

Its findings classified more than 1 million Medicare tests and procedures from 2016 to 2018 as being “overuse,” meaning they weren’t necessary. Among the services pinpointed were hysterectomy for benign disease and coronary stents for stable heart disease.

A year later, the Lown Institute released another report using Medicare claims data showing that more than 100,000 older Americans received unnecessary and potentially harmful procedures during the lockdowns between March and December 2020.

“You couldn’t go into your local coffee shop, but hospitals brought people in for all kinds of unnecessary procedures,” Dr. Vikas Saini, president of the Lown Institute, said in a press release. “The fact that a pandemic barely slowed things down shows just how deeply entrenched overuse is in American healthcare.”
The research identified 106,474 unnecessary procedures broken down into eight categories:
  • Stents for stable coronary disease: 45,176
  • Vertebroplasty for osteoporosis: 16,553
  • Hysterectomy for benign disease: 14,455
  • Spinal fusion for back pain: 13,541
  • Inferior vena cava filter: 9,595
  • Carotid endarterectomy: 3,667
  • Renal stent: 1,891
  • Knee arthroscopy: 1,596

1 in 4 Stents May Be Unneeded

Nearly one in four coronary stent procedures also met established criteria for overuse in the Lown Institute’s 2021 report. That amounted to as many as 200,000 patients receiving unnecessary stents from 2016 to 2018 from the data analyzed.

The analysis showed some of the most well-regarded U.S. hospitals had rates of coronary stent overuse above the national average. These four had rates at least double the national overuse average: Cleveland Clinic (44 percent), Houston Methodist Hospital (44 percent), Mt. Sinai (42 percent), and Barnes Jewish Hospital (42 percent).

“We’ve known for over a decade that we shouldn’t be putting so many stents into patients with stable coronary disease, but we do it anyway,” Dr. Saini said. “As a cardiologist, it’s frustrating to see this behavior continue at such high levels, especially during the pandemic.”

It’s particularly ironic in light of a large study of more than 5,000 patients that was released in The New England Journal of Medicine in 2019 that was expected to be a wake-up call about invasive approaches to cardiovascular disease. It showed those patients with severe but stable heart disease treated with medication and lifestyle advice faced no more risk of heart attack or death than those undergoing surgery.
“For the period that we followed participants, there was absolutely no survival benefit from the invasive strategy,” trial co-chair Dr. David Maron, clinical professor of medicine and director of preventive cardiology at the Stanford School of Medicine, said in a press release. “I think these results should change clinical practice. A lot of procedures are performed on people who have no symptoms. It’s hard to justify putting stents into patients who are stable and have no symptoms.”

Lower Heart Disease Deaths

Coronary artery disease, the narrowing of arteries that reduces blood to the heart, is the most common type of heart disease. It affects about 18 million Americans and is the leading cause of death in the United States, according to the National Institutes of Health. People sometimes have no symptoms at all until they experience chest pain, a heart attack, or sudden cardiac arrest.
Dr. Craig Backs, founder of the CureCenter, told The Epoch Times that none of the patients at his clinic who use lifestyle and medication interventions for preventing arterial disease have suffered a heart attack or stroke.

One patient of his had a heart catheterization recently to check the status of three stents he’d previously gotten in preparation for a recent spine operation.

“He’s been following our program for three years. The cardiologist was surprised, maybe disappointed, that his disease actually looked better,” Dr. Backs said. “There’s no doubt in my mind we’ve kept people from [having surgery]. The best way to have a good outcome from an elective surgery is to not ever have the surgery in the first place.”

His patients maintain high vitamin D levels, eat a low-inflammatory food diet, restrict processed foods, practice intermittent fasting, and exercise regularly.

Unproven: Vertebroplasty for Osteoporosis

Vertebroplasty is another controversial procedure with weak evidence. It’s used to treat osteoporosis-related fractures and involves injecting cement into the spine. It has been found to be ineffective for these fractures in numerous trials but is still overused by many hospitals. Lown Institute’s 2021 research found that in Florida alone, more than 3,600 vertebroplasties were performed in 2016 to 2018.

An acute injury or pressure to the spine can cause it to crush or crack. Traditional treatments for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures include bed rest, pain medication, braces, and physical therapy.

Since the late 1990s, however, vertebroplasty—which uses an acrylic bone cement inserted with radiologic guidance—has become the preferred treatment—at least for painful vertebral fractures that don’t respond to conservative treatment.

A meta-analysis from 2009 that took a look at 74 studies of vertebroplasty found that it was great for controlling pain for two weeks. By three months, however, the analysis found only fair evidence of benefit, and by two years after the procedure, no benefit remained.

Hysterectomies Performed for Benign Disease

Hysterectomies are another commonly overused surgery. Dr. Dunston performed thousands of hysterectomies—until she realized they weren’t truly fixing underlying issues. Most hysterectomies are used to repair fibroids, bleeding, or other symptoms—which in the majority of women, she said, are caused by excess estrogen and low progesterone.

“In some cases, we almost completely eliminate a woman’s ability to make estrogen and progesterone, which is a pretty horrendous state because every cell in every system in the body depends on these sex hormones. I like to call them flex hormones because they have flexible functions; they’re not just about sex,” Dr. Dunston said.

This can create additional symptoms and the need for more treatments—typically pharmaceuticals. There are about 600,000 hysterectomies performed each year in the United States, according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Hysterectomies involve removing the uterus, and sometimes the cervix. 
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology stated that rates have been declining, yet hysterectomies are still considered overutilized with about 60 percent used for conditions that have alternative therapies. In 38 percent of cases, no alternative treatment was attempted, and there was poorly documented justification for surgery in 18 percent of cases.

The reality, Dr. Dunston said, is that women desperate to fix problems caused by hormonal imbalances often recover from hysterectomy with new hormonal imbalances. Hormone production is altered because the uterus supplies half of the blood flow to the ovaries, which are vital to hormone production.

Patients now come to her new practice, which is focused on prevention and natural healing, desperate for help to recover from this surgery.

“The number of women who have serious hormonal imbalances after hysterectomy is huge. If you had fixed the hormonal imbalance you would be able to avoid the hysterectomy,” she said. “Women are just left out to suffer and this is considered OK. Which is just insanity to me. Why did it become OK to let human beings not live the quality of life that’s possible and available to them?”

Spinal Fusions Not a Superior Treatment

Spinal fusions are another common surgical treatment with weak evidence of efficacy in many cases. When it comes to the spinal pain, doctors can only diagnosis 5 percent to 7 percent of patients in a way that fits into a successful treatment paradigm, according to a 2016 article in Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal.

“Surgical treatment of non-specific back pain where no pathoanatomical diagnosis has been established is bound to fail. Therefore the outcome of spinal fusion in these patients can be no better than nonsurgical treatment,” the article stated.

Spinal fusion is one of several types of back surgery. It involves using metal implants to permanently connect two or more bones in the spine. Back surgery is often better at resolving nerve pain that shoots down the leg and can cause numbness, than it is at alleviating back pain, according to Mayo Clinic.

In fact, chronic back pain continues to inflict about 15 percent of patients who’ve undergone back surgery, according to a 2023 study in Cureus.
Mr. Lichtin saw several doctors and chiropractors for his herniated disc—caused when he jumped off a 10-foot fence—until he found the right practitioner. After a year of being unable to walk, he was able to eliminate his back pain. He moved to California for three years to see a chiropractor—Dr. John Bergman—whom he’d found on YouTube.

“I was adjusted some 250-odd times in 2016, and by October of that year, I was 100 percent better. I knew if I put my head down and found the right people my body would heal,” he said. “You have to be aggressive.”

Mr. Lichtin, who wrote about his experience, used the internet to search for people who had success healing their back injuries and reached out to strangers time and again for help. A former law school student, he went into what he called “bar exam” research mode. It was time-consuming, and it led him to some doctors that he also had to walk away from.

But that’s how he ultimately found the solution, which required him to step away from his job and life to prioritize healing—something not everyone is willing to do, he acknowledged.

“I feel like a lot of people are lazy, and they’re impatient, and they just accept whatever is told to them. These people don’t look at the rest of their life. You’re probably going to live 80, 90 years,” he said. “You’re either spending money on your illness or your wellness.”

For many patients facing a surgery recommendation, there are similar options. These can range from changing their diet, to getting physically active, to stepping away from a high-stress job. While surgery can be effective in many cases, there are also frequently less invasive—and far less risky—treatments that can resolve root causes or prevent the need for surgery altogether.

This article concludes our series.

Read the entire  “What You Need to Know About Surgery” series here.