1 in 4 Pregnant Women Not Getting Enough Omega-3 From Diet or Supplements

Although pregnant women should avoid eating certain types of fish because of their high mercury content, they shouldn’t shun fish altogether.
1 in 4 Pregnant Women Not Getting Enough Omega-3 From Diet or Supplements
(PR Image Factory/Shutterstock)
Susan C. Olmstead
4/20/2024
Updated:
5/1/2024
0:00

Women may feel that eating fish during pregnancy is risky because of years of concerning messaging about mercury contamination in certain species. But fish—especially oily fish—may be the best dietary source of the omega-3 fatty acids crucial to a baby’s development. The right amounts of safe fish are an important part of a pregnant woman’s diet.

“Omega-3 fatty acids are essential nutrients for supporting positive health outcomes. Getting enough of these nutrients during pregnancy is vital for preventing preterm birth and promoting optimal child health and neurodevelopment,” said Dr. Emily Oken, a Harvard Medical School professor and chair of the Department of Population Medicine at the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute.
However, a new study conducted by Dr. Oken and colleagues and published in the journal Public Health Nutrition shows that 25 percent of pregnant women were not getting enough omega-3 from their diet or supplements.

The study looked at fish consumption among 10,800 pregnant women and omega-3 supplement intake among 12,646 pregnant women from across the United States who were participating in a program called Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes.

Nearly 25 percent of the participants reported not eating fish or eating it less often than once per month, and only 16 percent took omega-3 supplements. Older mothers with higher education and income and those who were non-Hispanic white or Asian were most likely to take supplements. However, fish consumption was higher among women with racial or ethnic identities other than non-Hispanic white and among those who used tobacco and nicotine products.

Women’s fish consumption and omega-3 supplementation during pregnancy have been declining over the past decades, the investigators noted. They suggested that this phenomenon was “likely in response to federal advisories about mercury in fish since 2001.”

They proposed improved messaging to pregnant women regarding the importance of omega-3s.

“Current evidence shows that the benefits of maternal consumption of low-mercury fish, or in its place, omega-3 supplements, outweigh any potential risks,“ Dr. Oken said in a Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute statement. ”Our study provides updated information to inform much-needed public health advice and resources ... to encourage consumption of low-mercury fish during pregnancy and intake of omega-3 supplements among those who do not consume fish.”

Why Is Omega-3 Important During Pregnancy?

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosatetraenoic acid (EPA), two omega-3 fatty acids found in oily fish, are important for supporting a healthy pregnancy, the American Pregnancy Association noted on its website, and these fatty acids may reduce the risks of pre-term labor and postpartum depression.

For lactating women, adequate intake of the healthy omega-3s found in fish is linked to outcomes including better infant psychomotor development and a reduced risk of infant allergies, according to the association.

Fish also offers nutrients beyond omega-3s. The association points out that along with DHAs and EPAs, tuna contains protein, selenium, magnesium, calcium, potassium, vitamin B12, and other nutrients that support a healthy pregnancy, heart health, brain health, and overall well-being. The children of mothers who ate fish during pregnancy may have IQs averaging 7.7 points higher than children whose mothers did not eat fish, according to a study published in 2019.
The American College of Nurse-Midwives recommends that pregnant and breastfeeding women get about 200 milligrams (mg) to 300 mg of omega-3s per day—which can be obtained from about two servings of fish a week.

Fear of Fish: Mixed Mercury Messaging

Since 1994, the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) advice regarding fish consumption has recommended that pregnant women avoid eating shark and swordfish. (Larger predatory fish such as these accumulate more mercury in their bodies than smaller species do.)

In 2001, tilefish and king mackerel were added to this list, and the FDA issued an advisory recommending that pregnant women avoid these fish because of the possibility of mercury contamination.

Consumption of fish diminished following this 2001 advisory, according to one study published in 2003 (also by Dr. Oken and colleagues). The investigators found that total fish consumption declined by about 1.4 servings per month from December 2000 to April 2001, and this decline continued through the end of the study period.
The Environmental Protection Agency, in a 2013 report, disputed this finding, claiming that the agency’s research showed that fish consumption did not decrease among women of childbearing age after the 2001 advisory and a 2004 update.

“We can conclude that the issuance did not influence women on a national level to decrease their fish consumption,” the report reads.

However, Dr. Stephen Ostroff, former FDA acting chief scientist, said in a 2014 statement updating FDA advice to pregnant women, “For years many women have limited or avoided eating fish during pregnancy or feeding fish to their young children.”

The statement encouraged pregnant or breastfeeding women to consume eight to 12 ounces of various low-mercury fish per week for its nutritional benefits.

In 2017, further revised FDA advice added marlin, orange roughy, and bigeye tuna—which may have similar mercury concentrations to those of the fish on the original advisory—to the list of fish to avoid.

Weighing Risks and Benefits

Mercury advisories have not effectively informed consumers and have caused confusion, according to the website Mercury Facts and Fish, part of the Mercury Policy Project.

“Most people are not aware of specific government advice on mercury; those who know that mercury is a concern generally cannot say which fish they should avoid to reduce mercury exposure, or which fish are low in mercury and should be chosen often,” it reads.

Pregnant women may decide to just skip fish altogether, according to a 2018 study that evaluated messaging to pregnant women regarding fish in many countries.

“There is some evidence that pregnant women find the advice confusing and prefer to give up eating fish altogether rather than take the risk of harm,” the investigators said. “There is general agreement that pregnant women should eat at least two portions of fish per week, but this message is not always clear and prominent.”

But the benefits of eating fish outweigh the risks and the FDA’s precautions should not discourage pregnant women from eating fish, according to a 2023 study.

“When mothers regularly consume fish during pregnancy, their children are likely to have improved neurodevelopment compared to children of non-fish eaters, despite their exposure to methylmercury,” the authors wrote.

The fishing industry agrees. The website About Seafood, of the National Fisheries Institute, calls concerns about mercury in seafood “misinformation” and states that “nutrition science shows” that “the benefits of seafood (including nutrients like protein, B vitamins, vitamin D, selenium, omega-3 fatty acids) outweigh the theoretical risks of mercury.”
The National Fisheries Institute also stated: “There are no cases of mercury toxicity attributed to the normal consumption of commercial seafood found in any published peer-reviewed medical journal. By way of example, the average American eats 16 pounds of seafood annually. The average consumer in Japan eats 116 pounds. Even at nearly ten times the amount of seafood consumed, there is no epidemic of mercury toxicity in Japan.”

What Fish Are Safest to Eat? Are Supplements a Good Source?

The March of Dimes echoes the FDA in recommending pregnant women eat eight to 12 ounces a week of low-mercury fish, including:
  • Shrimp
  • Salmon
  • Pollock
  • Catfish
  • Canned light tuna
The organization recommends pregnant women avoid fish that are higher in mercury, including:
  • Shark
  • Swordfish
  • King mackerel
  • Tilefish
Although fish is the best source of omega-3s, other foods that contain omega-3s include:
  • Chia seeds
  • Edamame
  • Flaxseeds
  • Hemp seeds
  • Kidney beans
  • Seaweed
  • Walnuts
  • Wheat germ
Women who choose to not eat fish during pregnancy and instead rely on omega-3 supplements should choose capsules or fish oils that have been purified and are free of polychlorinated biphenyls and dioxin, according to the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

Supplements should have at least 200 mg of omega-3s, the group stated, and pregnant women should avoid fish liver oils such as cod liver oil because they can cause dangerous levels of vitamin A in the body.

Susan C. Olmstead writes about health and medicine, food, social issues, and culture. Her work has appeared in The Epoch Times, Children's Health Defense's The Defender, Salvo Magazine, and many other publications.
Related Topics