This Is What Stephen Hawking Wanted Engraved on His Tombstone

Legendary professor and theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking died this week at age 76.

Hawking died peacefully at his home in Cambridge on March 14, his family said.

Hawking knew for a while what he wanted to be engraved on his tombstone.

The Cambridge professor said he wanted what is known as Hawking’s equation.

The equation contains all of the most important elements of Hawking’s most important discovery, expressing the idea that black holes weren’t entirely black after all, instead they emit a glow that would become known as Hawking radiation.

“But to my great surprise, I found there seemed to be emission from the black hole. At first, I thought this must be a mistake in my calculation. But what persuaded me that it was real, was that the emission was exactly what was required to identify the area of the horizon with the entropy of a black hole. I would like this simple formula to be on my tombstone,” he continued.

“Black holes are extremely dense objects that warp the fabric of space and time around them. It was thought that nothing can escape from a black hole, but Hawking radiation contradiction that conventional wisdom,” according to Mashable. “Hawking found that unless black holes continue to feed on matter, they will eventually die by effectively radiating off small amounts of energy over the course of billions of years. Those black holes, if left without more matter to consume, would eventually shrink and then likely explode, blasting their guts back into the universe, effectively recycling whatever matter they took in over the course of their lifetime. It sounds simple enough, but by proposing that particles can, in fact, leave black holes, Hawking actually started a battle that has raged in cosmology for decades.”

“It is still the focus of theoretical interest—a topic of debate and controversy more than 40 years after his discovery. Indeed the Harvard theorist, Andrew Strominger (with whom Stephen recently collaborated) said that this paper had caused ‘more sleepness nights among theoretical physicists than any paper in history,” Rees wrote.