Is Finland Really Such a Happy Place?

The Global Well-Being Reports is deeply flawed. We should rethink how we measure national well-being.
Is Finland Really Such a Happy Place?
(Julia_Kivela/Visit Finland)
John Mac Ghlionn
3/26/2024
Updated:
3/27/2024
Commentary

The Finns seem to have many reasons to celebrate lately. In addition to becoming NATO’s newest member, Finland was also named the happiest country in the world—for the seventh year in a row, according to the most recent annual World Happiness Report.

However, behind these glitzy headlines lie a number of rather contradictory and disturbing truths.

What Is Really Going On?

First of all, happiness is a fleeting emotion, one of many we experience each day. Like indigestion and flatulence, it comes and goes. In fact, the average human being experiences more than 400 emotional states every 24 hours.

Despite being labeled the happiest country, Finland has a high suicide rate, specifically among its younger citizens.

Of the 44 countries in Europe, Finland has the highest proportion of people under 25 dying from drug overdoses. In 2022, almost 30 percent of drug-related casualties were 25 years old or younger. On average, Finnish drug users die 10 years earlier than users in other EU countries.

Moreover, an increasing number of Finns suffer from depression and anxiety, and the country has one of the highest rates of antidepressant consumption worldwide.

Considering that Finland is consumed by darkness for part of the winter, and a lack of sunlight is strongly correlated with poorer mental health, it’s unsurprising that so many Finns struggle with serious mental health problems. This begs the question: How can Finland be considered a happy place, let alone the happiest country in the world?

The UN Report Actually Tracks Satisfaction

Contrary to popular belief, the World Happiness Report doesn’t actually measure happiness. Instead, the report, commissioned by the United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network, analyzes global survey data from citizens in more than 150 countries. Based on their life evaluations over the three preceding years—in this case, 2021 to 2023—countries are then ranked on “happiness.”

In reality, what is being measured is something closer to well-being or satisfaction. And the difference between happiness and satisfaction goes far beyond semantics, as noted by the Nobel Prize-winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman.

Happiness is akin to a transient experience that occurs spontaneously. For instance, you meet a dear friend you haven’t seen for months at a local Starbucks, and you instantly feel happy. However, once the friend leaves, that happiness may be replaced by another emotion, like sadness.

Satisfaction, on the other hand, is a more permanent state of mind. It is not an emotion but something far more solid and stable—a continuous feeling built over many days, weeks, months, and years.

The ancient Greeks understood this well. Their philosophers called the pursuit of long-term satisfaction eudaimonia, which was separate from hedonism, the belief that nothing is more important than pleasure.

Realistic Finns vs. Unrealistic Americans

This brings us back to the people of Finland. For the average Finn, life is good simply because their expectations are realistic.
In contrast, the United States, which for the first time since 2012 no longer ranks in the top 20 happiest countries, is a place where unrealistic expectations reign supreme. This has been the case for years, we’re told.
To put happiness on a pedestal is to pathologize the very opposite feeling of sadness, a perfectly normal human emotion. As the popular psychotherapist Adam Lane Smith puts it, “It’s okay to be sad. That doesn’t mean you’re depressed. Not everything is a diagnosable issue.”
In the United States and beyond, many people have benefited from the so called “happiness hustle,” with authors selling books encouraging us to think ourselves happy, and numerous influential speakers lecturing the masses on the possibility of a happy existence.
It makes sense. Who doesn’t want to be happy? It’s a wonderful feeling. Nevertheless, our obsession should be on finding ways to live more satisfied lives and combat the widespread feelings of discontentment.

Flaws in Report’s GDP Obsession

The World Happiness Report is flawed, according to Dr. Daniel Benjamin, an academic who has dedicated years of his life to exploring the core ingredients of a truly good life.

A professor of behavioral economics and genoeconomics at University of California, Los Angeles, Mr. Benjamin stresses that the report measures gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, a key indicator of economic advancement but a poor gauge of overall welfare.

In short, the improvement of GDP per capita is closely associated with excessive consumption and production, benefiting only a small portion of society while also depleting our leisure time and harming the environment. Unfortunately, Mr. Benjamin notes, under this approach, wars and natural disasters can even be viewed as favorable occurrences. A high GDP per capita does not guarantee that people lead content and satisfying lives—yet it is always included in the World Happiness Report.
Moreover, Mr. Benjamin and his colleagues have shown that common survey questions used in happiness and well-being studies often lead to misinterpretations by both researchers and respondents, thus impacting data collection and representation.

By making small adjustments to the wording of survey questions, he noted, economists and participants can better align their understanding of the topics being discussed. However, this is just the beginning of a lengthy process to create a comprehensive measure of international well-being that can inform policy decisions.

Mr. Benjamin advocates for the development of an index that encompasses various aspects of well-being–in other words, something radically different than the current go-to report on happiness.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times. Epoch Health welcomes professional discussion and friendly debate. To submit an opinion piece, please follow these guidelines and submit through our form here.
John Mac Ghlionn is a researcher and essayist. He covers psychology and social relations, and has a keen interest in social dysfunction and media manipulation. His work has been published by the New York Post, The Sydney Morning Herald, Newsweek, National Review, and The Spectator US, among others.
twitter